Reactions to WADA's Independent Commission Report

Posted on 12 November 2015. Source:

The Report has overarching implications, as the Commission found sufficient grounds to prompt a French police investigation into IAAF officials.

Percy Wilman, associate editor of World Sports Law Report, spoke to Kendrah Potts and Dr. Gregory Ioannidis and got their initial reactions about the Report.

Kendrah Potts, Legal Director in the Sports Group at Mishcon de Reya

In summary, the [Independent] Commission confirmed “the existence of widespread cheating through the use of doping substances” by Russian athletes. This is said to have been facilitated (and often imposed) and/or covered up by various coaches, doctors and officials, including at the Moscow laboratory, Russian NADO (‘RUSADA’) and the national athletics federation (‘ARAF’). The Report also states that in the Commission’s view, “Russia is not the only country, nor athletics the only sport, facing the problem of orchestrated doping in sport.”

The direct consequences for athletics will be far-reaching. The report recommends that RUSADA and the ARAF be declared non-compliant with the WADA Code. The Commission also identified “corruption and bribery practices at the highest levels of international athletics” and evidence has been sent to Interpol for further investigation. The IAAF has been advised to appoint an independent chief compliance officer to monitor Code compliance.

Beyond athletics, the report is a salutary reminder of the importance of good governance at the highest levels of sport. The WADA Commission also provides further evidence to support the increased focus on investigations and intelligence in the 2015 WADA Code. The Commission relied, inter alia, on cyber analysis, whistleblowers and vast quantities of documentary evidence. The Commission’s findings underline, again, the value of investigation teams, which should complement testing programmes, as a means to combat doping.

Click here to read the full story.